QUESTION TO OBAMA
Dear Obama, first let me congratulate you for the simplicity and the positive power of your last speech
The best way to compete is to collaborate.
You spoke about building the future.
You said among other things that America cares for the quality of food, water and air in America.
As a nature lover, nothing makes me more depressed than to see the rate at which human development greatly has and continues to pollute land and the seas, destroying the natural beauty almost everywhere in this planet with its unrestricted procreation and busy, noisy progress frenzy.
My question is:
With all the talk on building the future, has America, this nation of great inventors of the modern way of life, concrete plans and acts to help NATURE WORLDWIDE to be restored from the enormous worldwide pollution created by technological progress, by plastics, for example, plans on investing in methods like that of Japan, for recycling plastic back to oil, on serious scientific competitive research on how to recycle atomic waste??
Here below I am questioning artists as myself the same question: what we are doing, what can we do for the world?
Your friend and supporter
van Chapman
(Geraldine Chapman)
www.naturestudio.net
What is relevant in Art for Canvascollectie?
OUR STANDPOINTS AND QUESTIONS
If one is concerned with the style of frames on a painting, for example, if they are modern or not in style, is that relevant to the world today?
It is not because a form is modern in style that is true in the spirit, but if an art is timeless, the other way around is true.
If a work is true and beautiful in spirit and form, it is always actual.
I am not prejudicing a work because it is modern. That is in fact the meaning of my Abstract Waterforms 1 video, to convey how abstract can be an aspect of nature, and a work based on abstract forms like this, can be spiritual in the sense that it can help people to see what is.
See the overwhelming beauty and richness we have in nature, which the world is destroying if it does not see.
Can you guarantee me that modern art is not prejudicing fine spiritual works( like those of Myriam Vandenberghe), simply because they are not modern in style??
Is it relevant to the world, for example, a work , even if modern in style, when it only adds to the existing pollution and insensibility, producing cloacas, for example, excrements out of good food, as art, in a world where people are dying of hunger, or tattooing pigs in a world animals like these live in dungeons only for consumption, is this more spiritual and relevant to the world today?
I am here to listen and try to understandn because as I see, for someone to label a work which expresses a profound state of communion with nature and life as a 'mere decoration' , simply because it is not modern in style, is indeed an unfair , tragic-comic projection.
A true, just or kind spirit is still good, without a form. But what is a form, however modern, without true spirit?
If a work is about form, or a style, and never mind the spirit, the justice, the truth, never mind the health the life the peace in this world, even if it is modern, is it relevant contemporary art?
Without the sensibility which true love gives to us, is any work relevant to the world?
When a true spirit takes form, no matter the style, it is art.
Once I heard the question: -" Can Art save the world?".
What can save the world is not a matter of taste but of consciousness. Not a mode, a style of Art. but to unite a true, and kind and just spirit in action, in whatever work we do.
To be humble enough to see what is, and not prejudge anyone, anything not even out of belief.
There is nothing substantially new in a work of art, or revolution, when you substitute one vanity of power for another, one prejudice for another.
van Chapman -Philosophic Community Projects -
True angels destroy not men, but the falseness in them.
www.naturestudio.net