Letter to president Obama
9 October 2014
Dear president Obama,
My sympathy for your gracious leadership and tremendous effort to keep up with so many issues to be resolved in this world.
I sincerely hope to help you understand the question of ISIS from a spiritual, non-religious perspective.
Let me confirming what Brother Rashid said to you :
in "A Message to President Obama from a former Muslim"
( https://plus.google.com/100481145869768252885/videos ).
Understanding the real nature of the problem of ISIS is crucial for solving it.
A call to self- awareness to Jihadists is needed, as well as to the awareness
that a fanatic, unquestioning belief, is not conducive to love and sincerity.
Love and sincere self-awareness alone could liberate us from religious
or other form of tyranny.
Best wishes for all.
Philosophic Community Project -
van Chapman
For a peaceful and intelligent solution to terrorism.
https://twitter.com/van_chapman/media
Here are some related tweets and other Facebook posts:
*******************************************************
Rather than kill unbelievers wherever you find them,
kill falsehood wherever you find
-even in your holy books!
********************************************************
Jihad unveiled: lying and murder may defend beliefs, not truth.
It only reveals how false, murderous are their beliefs!
A terrorist mind has been hijacked by a belief.
Ask a jihadist what he prefers: -Questions, or bombs?
If you question (the belief) you will be sentenced to death and hell.
If someone questions it, (the belief) kill him and send him to hell.
Holy war? End hypocrisy, and the hypocrite is no more!
End stupidity, and the stupid one ceases to be."
********************************************************
J. Krishnamurti, a wise man, once said:
"How can a mind full of beliefs be clear?"
There have been wise men throughout history,
like him Lao Tzu, Buddha,
who warned against indiscriminate,
unquestioning following, even of themselves.
If we, humans, descend from the apes,
or if our ancestors were barbarians,
(even if at the time, they were less barbarians than most,)
should we venerate them, today and imitate their behaviour,
even in their slaughter?
**********************************************************
Let me be honest with you,
because a Muslim who is trying to seduce you
to his "religion of Peace" will probably not
or no one would be seduced!:
In a Islamic State, you are a Muslim
if you are born of Muslim parents.
You may not have chosen the Islam,
but the punishment for leaving Islam,
(in some Islamic States), is the death sentence!
- Sahih Muslim, 16:4152
The Koran contradicts itself in this,
saying there is no compulsion in religion.
So what is true?
If diametrically opposite commands
like these can co-exist,
in their Koran or other Islamic teachings,
there is cause for bloody conflict
in the teachings themselves.
Muslims are divided in this issue. Is this their fault?
No. But they may not blame the religion.
That is also called apostasy in Islam.
**********************************************************
From what I read, this is exactly what is happening
since the death of Mohammed.
between for example Shiite and Sunni Muslims.
Because of this terror religious doctrine,
that sanctions killing
in name of God, Muslims are killing each other,
over almost any difference of belief!
According to critics of Mohammed, as Moses before him,
he has even killed for a criticism!
And that is not intelligent, is it?
Such is the belief of the Muslims.
But not as they see it,
if they may not be critical of the Islam.
**********************************************************
Phobia means fear. irrational fear -
I neither fear or hate Muslims.
Muslims learn to fear Islam, submit to it: believe or die!
They are Islamophobes, Islam fearing, not I.
For me, God is love. Islam not.
Love is stronger.
I would not kill someone for their belief,
as ISIS in a Jihad does.
Instead, I would try to reason with Mohammed and his God:
-What if I said:
"-You are free to love me or not"?
That would be loving, fair, not?
But if I said: "-Love me or I will kill you",
or:"-If you leave me I will kill you,"
what for a person would I be?
A beast?
What has possessiveness to do with wisdom and love?
What does this have to do with the Most Graceful?
1- "There is no compulsion in religion."
2- "No other religion other than Islam will be allowed."
3 -"The punishment for leaving Islam is the death penalty."
I am free to see what I see.
(I see this basic contradiction with love in Islam.).
If I must believe it makes sense when it does not,
and I will be killed, the fundamentals of Islam violate
a fundamental right of consciousness :
to see for itself!
Philosophic Community Project -
van Chapman
For a peaceful and intelligent solution to terrorism
**********************************************************
From: THE WHITE HOUSE
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 3:22 AM
To: naturestudio
Subject: Shameful
Extract of a notification sent from the White House to Naturestudio
(Quote)"a few minutes ago, a minority in the United States Senate decided it wasn't worth it. They blocked common-sense gun reforms even while these families looked on from the Senate gallery.
By now, it's well known that 90 percent of the American people support universal background checks that make it harder for a dangerous person to buy a gun. We're talking about convicted felons, people convicted of domestic violence, people with a severe mental illness. Ninety percent of Americans support that idea. Most Americans think that's already the law.
And a few minutes ago, 90 percent of Democrats in the Senate just voted for that idea. But it's not going to happen because 90 percent of Republicans in the Senate just voted against that idea. " (end quote).
Naturestudio answers:
Thank you for contacting Naturestudio.
I see it is a shame to Republicans.
Will publish a synthesis of your news on my website and face book.
Sent previously to the Whitehouse
December 2012
What to do to change the weapon possession race in the US as in the rest of the World?
The answer is simple ’Do not do to others what you would not like to be done to yourself.’
As by American Foreign Policy the right to (Nuclear) arms possession is to be strictly forbidden to terrorists, and limited to countries or individuals who fully comply with human rights, so should the same as a law apply within the US for the arms possession of each member State or individual citizen.
Arm the just and fair, unarm the unjust and unfair, so one may not need to resort to deadly weapons, for
true angels destroy not men, but the falseness in them.
van Chapman
-Philosophic Community Projects -
www.naturestudio.net
******************************************************************
Thank you for contacting the White House.
******************************************************************
Thank you for contacting the White House.
